Martin Luther King’s

Published 09 Dec 2016

The first aspect and the most powerful of Martin Luther King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail, is the argument that King makes on behalf of his actions and the actions of other African Americans who are seeking their equal treatment under the law. Within the Rogerian Argument, it is essential to include within the body, for the writer to give an objective statement concerning his or her opinion. This is not done in an inflammatory way or a disrespectful way and a good writer can give a strong response which can accurately describe his closely held opinion without being disrespectful in the process. This was never hard for Martin Luther King.

Towards the end of his letter, King talks about the two spheres of African American thought that which are counterproductive. The first being those African Americans who have been so beat down and oppressed for so long, that the have become apathetic towards the cause for freedom. The second however, are the African Americans, Malcolm X, specifically, who seek to express their frustrations in colorful terms and through hatred, violence and separation from the society by calling white people devils and other derogatory terms. The former, but especially the latter has never been a characteristic of either Martin Luther King or the Rogerian Argument. Together, both create a classic within American literature: Martin Luther King’s Letter from Birmingham Jail.

King’s opinion is not to be ignored nor confused with what it was in reality. King and his role in the demonstrations against the segregationist beliefs in practices in the South, but specifically, Birmingham, Alabama caused him to be imprisoned and was where he was writing this most famous letter; in the cell at the Birmingham Jail on April 16, 1963, only a few months before his famous I Have a Dream Speech. Letter from a Birmingham Jail is a response to eight white clergy who had openly criticized him for his illegal actions towards what King and millions of other African Americans felt, were immoral laws. King responded to these members of the clergy in what has become classic Rogerian in which respects the opposing views, encourages an open dialogue, is non confrontational, yet spirited in his beliefs and grabs hold of the pluralistic truths which exist between these two groups of clergy, although the white clergy might not have been aware of before the writing of this letter.

Our Customers Often Tell Us:

I’m don’t want to write my paper now. I want to spend time with my family

Specialists propose:

If You Think About Someone To Write Your Paper – Essaylab The Right Place!

In the beginning of the letter, King starts by directing and defining his opposite viewpoint to the members of the clergy who had been criticizing him. “You deplore the demonstrations taking place in Birmingham…. It is unfortunate that demonstrations are taking place in Birmingham, but it is even more unfortunate that the city’s white power structure left the Negro community with no alternative.” This white power structure that King references, had to do with the police and the policy makers of Birmingham, but also was a direct reference to the leaders of the church in and around Birmingham, as the letter will continue in full detail, as King criticizes the actions, or lack there of, which the white church and its leaders, have failed to respond to the injustices of as King calls them “their white brothers.”

King continues to express the necessity of these demonstrations as there have been many cases in the past in which well intentioned members of the white community and clergy have criticized the actions of the African American community, while being ignorant of the prejudices which they face on a regular basis. “Birmingham is probably the most thourally segregated city in the United States. Its ugly record of brutality is widely known. Negros has experienced grossly unjust treatment in the courts.” This is a statement which may or may not incite the type of response that King would have wanted. However, to allow for no confusion as to the difficulty that African Americans have in the pursuit of their most basic rights, King uses an example that he hopes, will pull at the heartstrings of those who will read his letter as he refers the question that his little daughter asked him one night.

“Daddy, why do white people treat colored people so mean?, when you take a cross country drive and find it necessa4ry to sleep night after night in the uncomfortable corners of your automobile because no motel will accept you; when you are humiliated day in and day out by nagging signs reading `white’ and ‘colored’ when your first name becomes nigger, your middle name becomes boy… and your last name becomes John?” In this, King has presented his opinion and his desire to expedite the slow process of waiting for justice to come, as was the suggestion of the white members of the clergy who had been criticizing his actions.

“Another aspect of the Rogerian Argument is the expression for an open dialogue.” Dr. King has no problem in requesting this as he has yet to have a chance to argue in the courtroom of public opinion, the justice of their case. Within the white community, this, if given the chance, would have more effect than seeing hundreds of African Americans being put in jail for disobeying the law. This results in the white community seeing these demonstrators as simply outside agitators and their actions are lost on an uncaring public. An open forum of dialogue is what King and the rest of the African American community had been hoping for.

However, this chance was not afforded to them and to King specifically, despite his request for such a chance to make any lasting changes. King references the time in which he talked to the leaders of Birmingham’s economic community in order to have the stores within the community, remove the segregation signs from their store windows. King stated in his letter: “As weeks and months went by, we realized that we were the victims of a broken promise. A few signs, briefly removed, returned; the others remained.” This disappointment, as well as failure to elect city officials that will respect the rights of the African American, makes it necessary, in the mind of King and millions of others for action to take place. However, King never was for his entire life, against an open dialogue for progress and peace.

However important the other aspects of Dr. King’s argument were, it is the attempt to connect to the plural truths that both King and the white members of the clergy possess, or at least they should possess. Dr. King was the most important civil rights leader in American history. However, before he was famous, he and his father and grandfather were all preachers. Despite King being catapulted to fame after the Mississippi Bus Boycott in 1955, King still remained true to his true calling: to preach the word of God. This common bond of faith in Jesus Christ is what King references multiple times in his Letter from Birmingham Jail in an attempt to show the reason for his actions and the necessity of more members of the white churches, coming to the aid of their black brothers in the pursuit of their desire for equal treatment under the law.

Not only does King reference the teachings and example of Jesus but also of the great Christian thinkers of the past and the fervency of the 1st century Christians who would rather be fed to the lions then go against their faith and what they knew to be right. King stated: “Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that “an unjust law is no law at all” King also referenced the Old Testament figures of Shad rack, Meshach and Abendnego who rather than chose to eat what was unholy before the Lord and to worship the god of the king Nebuchadnezzar, choose to be fed to a fiery flame as they would rather do that than go against their consciousness and their God. King asks if there is such an ideology among the members of the white church when it comes to their seemingly apathy towards the plight that is suffered to them and ignored by an increasingly apathetic church. This is the theme that is seen throughout his letter.

Dr. King expresses he need for the help from the white community but at the same time, warns the white community what will happen if this help is not given. “And I am further convinced that if our white brothers dismiss as ‘rabble rousers’ and ‘outside agitators’ those of us who employ non violence direct action, and if they refuse to support our nonviolence efforts, millions of Negroes will, out of frustration and despair, seek solace and security ion black-nationalist ideologies a development that would inevitably lead to a frightening racial nightmare.” It was in the benefit of the entire country, that enough of King’s contemporaries. Took him seriously and the needs of the black community which he outlined, in order that the black nationalists and their hate filled speech, did not gain more of a following then they did. Aspects of the Rogarian Arguments were important in this not coming to fruition.

“In the end, the Rogarian method is one in which respect for the other person, despite their disagreement or even oppression of one’s beliefs and efforts.” This can also be applied to much less important issues as the ones expressed in Dr. King’s Letter From a Birmingham Jail. In any aspect of one’s life in which one possesses an opposing view and wishes to have this view heard, despite the foregone knowledge that the receiver will most likely disagree with the sender’s assertions, yet the attempt is made to increase the chances in which both may come to some sort of an agreement.

In Dr. King’s letter, he attempts to connect to the mutual love for Jesus that both members of clergy have and as well as the encouragement that the white church act as Christians or Christ-like as is the true meaning of the word. This is done, not by preaching to the white clergy, despite the fact that Dr. King was a preacher. He knows that a sermon about the wrongness of their actions will result in a the receivers of the letter to put up walls of protection as is the case whenever anyone preaches directly to somebody about the immorality of their actions.

Dr. King continues to explore the common ground, or what should be the common ground between a black member of the clergy and the white members of the clergy. It seems as though the two should be aligned in spreading the word of God and to save souls though the grace of Jesus and to follow his command of ‘love thy neighbor’. These are not only the teachings but the commandment of God as seen in the last chapter of the Gospel of Matthew. However, in this letter, King correctly sites the seemingly difficulty that he and other African American leaders have had in obtaining assistance from the white church. In this, King points out the counterproductive aspects of these two factions of the church, seemingly working against each other and the need for the two to come together.

This is one of the main differences between Dr. King and other leaders of the African American community. Dr. King’s letter has strong aspects of the Rogarian argument but so too does his life and actions. Dr. King is remembered for his great skills of oratory but Malcolm X also had these skills as well. So why doesn’t the world recognize the greatness of Malcolm X as they do Dr. King? The reason is that Dr. King followed the stages of the Rogarian method, and Malcolm X did not. As it was referenced in this letter, Dr. King has chosen to express his anger and resentment towards the present situation which African Americans are faced with in American society through prayer, civil disobedience and turning the other cheek. Dr. King does not let the members of the white community and also the white church and its clergy off the hook by their inactivity and apathy towards the plight of the African American Christian but he is not disrespectful either.

These tactics were embraced by Malcolm X and the Black Panther Party and both Dr. King and the large majority of the white community, were appealed and resistant towards anything that was said or would ever be said. Malcolm X spoke only to black people whereas Dr. King spoke to both those who agreed with him and those that did not in the attempt to have his point of view understood. When people are being threatened and called deragatory terms, regardless of their color, the message of the sender is usually lost in the translation. Dr. King recognized this and as a result, his Letter from Birmingham Jail as well as his life in general, was more widely accepted than any other contemporary who had many of the same aims.

Dr. King seeks to avoid this as he knows that he will get a more favorable response if he applies the Rogarian Method, either knowingly or unknowingly, to the rightness of his cause and the cause of millions of African Americans across the country. As is the case in one’s own personal letter in which the author wishes to apply the Rogarian Method, despite the strong difference of opinions, it is important to include in the letter, usually at the end, a compliment of some sort in order to offset any possible hurt or angry feelings. This is not done in an attempt to apologize for the content of the aforementioned letter but to leave the receiver with an attempt at a favorable response of the sender.

Dr. King did this in the latter half of the letter and then at the close. “I am thankful, however, that some of out white brothers in the South have grasped the meaning of this social revolution and committed themselves to it. They are still too few in quantity, but they are big in quality…. Others have marched with us down the nameless streets of the South.” Also, at the close of his letter in what some may have seen as condescending but which appears to be a genuine concern for the health and well being of those who criticized him in which this letter was a result of, Dr. King ends by saying: “I hope this letter finds you strong in the faith. I also hope that circumstances will soon make it possible for me to meet each of you, not as an integrationist or a civil rights leader but as a fellow clergyman and a Christian brother.” In this respect, Dr. King never did forget the teachings of Jesus to love thy neighbor, despite the actions of those who should be on the side of justice and the teachings of Jesus, but who actually end up the foes of Dr. King and his attempt to bring equal treatment under the law for every African American as well as every minority in America.


  • Barnet, Sylvia. The Little Brown Reader: The Rogerian Argument. New York: Harper Collins 1996
  • King, Martin Luther. Letter From a Birmingham Jail. New York: Harper Collins 1994
  • Johnson, Mary. Martin Luther King & The Civil Rights Movement. Boston: PBS Productions 2004
  • The positive Impact of Music to Our Lives
  • Martin Luther King Jr.
Did it help you?