Order Now
Menu
  Back to all posts Government and Law Essays

An Analysis of the Florida Electronic Voting System

by Expert Amelina | 16 Aug 2016

Thus, after the 2000 presidential election, a majority supported the move towards computerized election the use of touch-screen voting machine. Its efficacy was tested in the recent elections in Florida where around 18,000 votes in Sarasota County were missing. According to a newspaper report entitled “Florida debacle shows perils of electronic voting; the security of paperless voting machines cannot be guaranteed, a federal agency says”, this represents 15 percent of under-voting in Sarasota County rendering questionable the result of Florida’s 13th Congressional District Elections. Until now the issue between the two candidates is still unresolved.

Need essay sample on

"An Analysis of the Florida Electronic Voting System" topic?

We will write a custom essay sample specifically for you

Proceed

This led to doubts about the wisdom of shifting from paper-based elections to electronic touch-screen voting machines. The fears and apprehension of some sectors against the immediate shift to computerized elections have basis after all. As a result, even Governor Charlie Crist has announced that he plans to change voting systems in Florida so that ballots can be verified by paper trail and that he wants to replace touch-screen voting machines with optical scanners in 15 counties.

An analysis however of the Florida Electronic Voting System reveals that sophisticated technology is not the solution to the problems of the election. This system despite its advantages failed in measuring up to certain standards of a good voting system. Although it is acknowledged that electronic voting systems have removed the hassles of the paper-based election the time, however, is not yet ripe for the swift change.

There are specific concerns about the software program that runs the voting system which computer experts say is questionable and can be manipulated or hacked from outside.

One issue raised against the electronic voting system is the security of the software that operates the voting system. It is argued that there is no assurance that the security features of the voting system are strong enough to protect it from hackers who could either come from within the company selling the electronic voting system or from outside. According to Christopher Drew (2007), computer scientists from California universities have successfully hacked into three electronic voting systems. If three electronic voting systems can be hacked then it is also possible that all the other voting systems is not secured and may also be hacked.

Another issue raised against the use of the electronic voting system is the lack of a paper trail that will help verify the results of the election in case of any controversy. Taking into account the questions surrounding the reliability of the software that will operate the electronic voting system, it is very important that there must be a paper trail that will confirm if the results of the election are accurate. This principle is termed as its audibility. Another point is that using the electronic voting system, the electorate will be relying on a memory card the accuracy of which is still unreliable. Other loopholes include the possibility of over voting and the complexity in its use that may discourage, the old, disabled and illiterate from voting.

Critics also say that the lack of paper – trail may prove disastrous in case the result of elections is so close that it is necessary to do a recount. In the case of a very close election, a recount is generally recognized as the last resort which can help determine the actual results of the election. At present, there is no electronic equipment that can provide this kind of security or guaranty to the electorate.

Many of the equipment that is currently available are unreliable and provide the opportunity for fraud. As mentioned previously, the public demands that the following minimum standards comply with in any election:

  • a) the anonymity of the voters must be preserved;
  • b) the voting system used must be tamper-resistant;
  • c) the entire voting system including the manner of choosing the candidates and reflecting this choice in the ballot must be comprehensible to the voter regardless of their age or disability. These are the basic requirements for the conduct of a free and honest election.

The problem however with the shift to the electronic voting system is that it does not guaranty the privacy and audibility of the result of the election. It is argued that the present equipment we have right now do not protect the privacy of the voters and provide for a paper-trail that can be used to recount and verify the results of the election. For the electronic voting system to work, the software program must be able to backtrack vote totals from the actual ballots that come from legitimate voters to ensure its audibility. At the same time, the ballot must not be able to identify or be traced back to the voter to ensure his privacy. The present electronic voting machines we have right now do not provide for these two mechanisms that are essential before the public could actually trust these machines. Many experts add that these two concerns cannot be mutually satisfied with the use of any electronic voting systems.

Modernization of the conduct of election from beginning to end is the desired end. This, however, presupposes that the right computer and electronic voting systems must be in place. We currently do not have this technology. It is indeed erroneous for the public to think that the technology we currently have can provide the solution to our voting problems. Using computers and voting machines will not immediately lead to a better election. As of the moment, Florida is simply not yet ready for the drastic change.

Learn more:
Case Brief of O’Connor vs Donaldson Hurricane Katrina Injustice and Racial Discrimination An Analysis of Fingerprint Identification

Do You need a paper on this topic?

Order Your Essay
Writer avatar

essaypoint

№20 In global rating

1325

finished papers

768

customer reviews

95%

success rate

Writer avatar

Prof_Kennedy

№5 In global rating

79

finished papers

47

customer reviews

100%

success rate

Writer avatar

BrilliantEssays

№1 In global rating

336

finished papers

232

customer reviews

100%

success rate

Writer avatar

Alice Lindsay

№14 In global rating

190

finished papers

137

customer reviews

99%

success rate

Writer avatar

The_Intellectual

№13 In global rating

239

finished papers

128

customer reviews

96%

success rate

Writer avatar

Dr. Didion

№7 In global rating

621

finished papers

358

customer reviews

98%

success rate

Writer avatar

Sharon,

№19 In global rating

423

finished papers

287

customer reviews

95%

success rate

Writer avatar

Dr Walden Ph.D

№6 In global rating

169

finished papers

95

customer reviews

100%

success rate

Writer avatar

Dr.Nora.PhD

№12 In global rating

2029

finished papers

1192

customer reviews

95%

success rate

Writer avatar

MD. Nilerma

№17 In global rating

139

finished papers

72

customer reviews

97%

success rate

Order your paper now!

I need
My email
By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related emails.

EssayLab Reviews

  • Jason (student)

    I asked Essay Lab to write an essay for me and received paper the next day after I ordered it! Thank you!

  • Kimberly (student)

    Awesome WORK! If I ever need to write my essay – I will use only EssayLab!

  • Matt (student)

    These people are lifesavers! Just ask – “write me an essay” and they will start right away!

Support contacts

[email protected]