Order Now
Menu
  Back to all posts Government and Law Essays

Reserve Clause

24 Feb 2017Government and Law Essays

Based from the US sports professional culture, Reserve Clause is a clause or part of the contract that contained in a standard contract but that upon the expiration of the player’s contract he or she has to be retained by the team to which he has signed with. Such signing of contract disallows the player to move to other teams even though the contract expires. He would only be allowed to join other team unless otherwise released by the team. He would be given option, though to ease the burden. His first option is to a) play for another year for the same team, or; b) be released through signing legal documents (Wikipedia, 2007).

The reserve clause came into existence when the United States Supreme Court held a ruling during the 1922 case Federal Baseball Club v. National League (259 U.S. 200). The court said that as a sport, baseball was not primarily a business and that is should not be in an arena of "interstate commerce" as well as it is also against the antitrust law.Prior to this, players were free to move to other team as soon as they have completed their contract and then demand higher salaries. Thus other athletes especially those that are bound by their contracts were getting unequal benefits which in turn demoralized them. With this court ruling, team owners standardized contracts to all players to avoid demand for insignificant high salaries. Now, all players’ contracts are prepared for one year and long-term contracts are avoided. This kind of contract was for the protection of the team as well as players who have been loyal to their teams.

A professional player is said to be in a free agency if he can negotiate freely for a contract to a team while without any obligation from other team. A player is now in a "pool" of free agents from which the player can now scout and sign a contract for a team of his choice.

There are economic drawbacks, however, with free agency. First, this case is not beneficial to teams because it can lead to battle of biddings. The increased of salaries means the decreased in the profit of the team.
In the European sports, the transfer system has always been a puzzle to outsiders. Why should a previous employee be hindered by his previous company to move to another company? In the world of sports, this is different. In 1963, the case of George Easthamin concerning “transfer and retain system” was declared illegal. And yet this system did not stop because it has not been challenged legally.

Retain and transfer system was used in the sport’s world of football to keep wages low. It has similarity with the US Reserve Clause since this system prevents the player to transfer freely to other club even he is out of contract. In Europe, this scenario was defended by the owners of the team and presumed that players love to play with the labor market to earn more. So in this case, the players lose their bargaining power and they cannot request permission from their old club to move to other club.

However, the Bosman case in 1995 has stirred the sport society in Europe. This case has resulted in abolishing the system by the European Court of Justice which controls the number of foreign players in a certain team. The result is the increase in wage dramatically for the top players.

Club members in reaction to this ruling has called for a wage cap to prevent players dictate their wages but this was ruled out to be anti-competitive and fascist under European law. In comparison with the US counterpart, the volume of players’ movement is declining because of the transfer fee and clubs now can just sit and spy for any target player who will be on a free agent status anytime (Davis, 2007).
But the good news does not end there as some European clubs still requests for a transfer fee from their players who want to transfer but still within the period of their contract. The European Commission is helpless with this system. As of today, clubs and players sign the usual employment contract that indicates contract period. This contract binds the player from moving to other clubs in as much as the club is prohibited to assign players to other club without the players’ agreement. But what happen was that, players always move beyond their contract and break this agreement.

Then what happens where there is constant breakage of the rules. This is now the biggest problem faced by the European Commission and the English legal system as it is very difficult to retain players against their will.
Eventually in 1998 after the European Commission began to greatly consider the Bosman case, the commission has came up with proposals. The agreement will commit FIFA in altering their regulations. The changes will focus on preserving transfer fees for new players and this will be in placed as compensation for training costs, providing incentives to develop young players and means to discourage players from moving out illegally. Players ages 18 and below are the most privileged in this proposal. They will have a free movement within clubs in the European Union as long as their club follows a code of conduct and will provide guarantee for academic education and training. This privilege however, will be voided if the player’s family moved out of Europe (Foster, 2001)

Work Cited:

  • Davis. (2007). Reserve clause [Electronic Version]. Retrieved August 24.
  • Foster, K. (2001). Transfer Fees: Still (Il)Legal After All These Years?
  • Wikipedia. (2007). Reserve clause [Electronic Version].

Order your paper now!

I need
My email

EssayLab Reviews

  • Jason (student)

    I asked Essay Lab to write an essay for me and received paper the next day after I ordered it! Thank you!

  • Kimberly (student)

    Awesome WORK! If I ever need to write my essay – I will use only EssayLab!

  • Matt (student)

    These people are lifesavers! Just ask – “write me an essay” and they will start right away!