Nazi Germany Was a Greater Horror Than Stalinist Ussr

Running head: NAZI GERMANY WAS A GREATER HORROR THAN STALINIST USSR 1

NAZI GERMANY WAS A GREATER HORROR THAN STALINIST USSR 4

Nazi Germany was a greater horror than Stalinist USSR
Name
Institution
Professor
Course
Date

Introduction
Back in the 19th century, Germany was under the control of dictators. Adolf Hitler is believed to have controlled Germany from 1935 to 1945. Over this period the country was regarded Nazi Germany. Stalinist on the other hand ruled the Eurasian continent under the Soviet Union from 1922 to 1991. In his reign Stalinist embraced socialism in lead the state. Despite their vast ruling approaches, similarities and differences were identifiable especially on the ways Hitler led Germany and Stalin control over the Soviet Union. This piece of writing will compare Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union commonly regarded as the USSR in terms of people preferences. In the comparison, the paper will focus on the pre-war Nazi and the pre-war USSR by exemplifying which of the two was worse to its people.
Over Hitler’s reign, Germany was controlled under Nazism, racial discrimination and anti-Semitism. Hitler stood for a nationalist party while Stalin led the Soviet Union through communism. Hitler is remembered for having murdered a considerable number of people within a short period of time. In the European history, the Nazi Holocaust is remembered as the most horrifying tragedies to have been reported in the in the states. The Nazis have been evil¸ killed ten thousands of people, and rightly, they have universally condemned for their horrific actions. On the same not, the soviets were equally evil and killed millions of people, yet they have not been treated with the same universal condemnation as the Nazis. Historically, they are the easily favored side due to various political and social factors. The soviets have been criticized and condemned by the conservatives, libertarians, and moderates as a typical example of the actual essence of evil.
Partly, the unequal condemnation of the two sides makes sense: In Russia when socialism reigned, leftists were greatly in great admiration of the Nazis and soviets regimes. Understandably, that factor would subsequently lead them to avoidance and denial. Nevertheless, some scholars have come out in defense of the Nazis, claiming that the communists were actually more morally upright than the fascists albeit the former having killed more people. When confronted with the glaring truth that Stalin had killed more Jewish people without any justifiable reasons, many critics would typically retaliate that he never killed them as Jews but as distractors and dissenters (Sydney Hook). On occasion, the Jews were treated without discrimination; this was a reason enough to make them believe the equal treatment was of more importance than the alleged injustices.
The vilifying of Hitler has characterized most of the debates that involve the comparisons of the Nazi Germany and the Stalinist USSR. Some people have urged that it is mythical to believe in the notion that Hitler is the evil monster between the two. There are exemplary occurrences of the cruelty of Lenin, his malice in ordering executions, his brutal and illegal seizure of power, the mass terror institutions as a political control strategy, and the first camps constructions in what became the gulag. Sydney writes that far from undermining or perverting the legacy of Lenin, as is often assumed, Stalin was logically Lenin’s heir. Critics of the Nazi regime assert that Hitler seized power by force and fear. Hitler was in deep contempt of the soviet methods. He used the model of consensus dictatorship, sounding out the opinions of the public, cautious, and changing his probable course when necessary. Contrary to Stalin, Hitler did not indulge the habit of killing his closest allies. The communist life under the governance of Hitler experienced occasional purges that were a habitual feature of the Nazi regime. Adversaries of Hitler were subjected into subordination but because of the seemingly successful aspects of his regime.
When observing the Nazi and Hitler regimes there are several clear-cut differences in comparison with the Stalinist Russia’s workings; however, one of the strategies that was used by the Nazi regime was to suppress the opposition parties. But more interestingly it has been argued that the emphasis on the number of deaths is not an accurate estimate of the vilification of the two parties. In this sense, the most fundamental characterization of the two regimes is arguably not ideological but geographical. Based on the idea that both the Stalinists and Nazis tended to murder people in similar places, in the regions between Moscow and Berlin, and given that the killings happened at different times, allies, rivals, and enemies, it must be put into consideration that some of the destruction and deaths that were wrought in the above mentioned land might have been their mutual responsibility.
Overall, all radical philosophies and arguments that relate to this debate are reactionary. The motives rather than the numbers of deaths caused by the two regimes should be analyzed as the basis of the more evil of the two regimes. For Nazism, the anti-Semitism and nationalism convergence ushered a newly diabolical political movement a way of building the pride of Germany by vilifying the menace of the Jews. The result of the Stalinist was panting a bleak mage of the world without any room of divergent political thought wiggling.