Is Free Enterprise Better Than Socialist Systems?

Surname 6

Philosophy Examination
Name
Institution
Professor
Course
Date
Free enterprises are characterized by the maximum freedom for private businesses carry out their operations and make profits with minimal regulation from the government. Socialistic systems, on the other hand, is a social and economic system where the society own means of production, control the means of production and also have the influence on the ideologies made by the politicians.. The argument also examines contradictory statements that may be false. Well, claiming the superiority of free market over socialist systems is so synthetic and the different people may debate different on how they view these topics. Certainly, there is a lot of connectedness between resource allocation and how different societies could like them to be governed and managed to attain maximum fairness among the people.
The premises and conclusions
The argument mentions premises, 2 3 and 4. Premises 4has been categorized as unproblematic socialism. This rise danger when trying to approve that premises 2 and 3 are true. Premises two will be analytic if its allocation is assumed to be a definition produced by market forces while premises 3 will are analytic when interpretations are made to mean economic efficiency at the basis of efficiency and inefficiency.
Premises are true
The premises whose decision depends on the government officials are more vivid in socialistic systems. Some may be superior that other depending on the level of services they accord their clients who in this case are the members of the society. In most cases, the government incurs the cost of every expense that their citizens make. Contrary to this, private premises are mostly dominant in free enterprises communities and people are expected to pay for the goods and services they want to utilize. Well, both socially owned premises and free enterprises are true depending on the society one is coming from. However, due to demographic issues and technological advancements, free enterprises have emerged to be superior to socialist systems and supported by most societies since people are rewarded with respect to their effort and contribution to the society.
Analytical statement
Supporters for free enterprises believe that it’s effective to allocate resources via market forces as compared to the government. I regard this as an analytical statement from the fact that the government may take long procedures to allocate the resources to citizens who might be so many anyway. The government will, therefore, increase the time wastage in the utilization of some basic requirements by the citizen.
Purpose and method of definition
Analytic statements are will be helpful in this argument as they are true by definition especially when they are justified and particular to a concept. For instance, it’s analytically true that in free enterprises it is the market forces that determine the allocation of resources in the society hence superior to the social system in this case
Claiming that free market system resource allocation is dependent on market forces can as well be synthetic. This is because most governments in free enterprise societies influence pricing, quality, and quantity. In such a case, free market enterprises decisions are regulated by governments as it does to socialistic systems.
The logic as to whether free enterprises are superior to socialist systems is valid. It will vary from one person to the other based on the fact that these two systems have their advantages and disadvantages. The validity of the statement, therefore, depends on the society in which they are applied. People in capitalistic nations will go to the free market as opposed to those whose economic class is almost the same. They will prefer bringing their efforts together to grow together.
Governmentally controlled premises will claim that their intention is to accord all citizens equal rights and opportunities without any biases. This will reduce conflict and discord and escalate the level of harmony and cooperation in such societies. On the other hand, most free enterprises will urge that their system allows innovations and inventions to take place as survival is entitled to the fittest which gives this approach superiority to socialist systems making their conclusion analytic.
I cannot credit superiority to any of these enterprises. But I will regard free enterprises as it is the most effective way to satisfy the needs of customers. It increases variety in the market and people make purchases according to their efforts. Free markets have escalated the level of development in a nation that the socialistic systems that will increase the departments that a government will handle. In one way or the other, incompetence might be highly experienced in socialist societies that free enterprises a reason that makes free markets superior to socialist systems.
Logical strength of the argument. The strength of this claim is basically on the ability of free enterprises to reduce conflict directed to the government. Socialistic systems are in most times used by politicians with ill motives to satisfy their own goal. This creates irony since there main reason for socialistic enterprises is to serve all the people in the society fairly and equitably. Premise gave good reasons for their conclusions
Premises 2,3 and 4 have justified their genuine reason for conclusions made since the strength of free market is opposed to socialist is based on market arguments
Inductive statement
Well, claiming that free markets are superior to socialism is to general and could be inductive depending on the argument attached that criticizes the weakness of socialism premises
Strength of the argument
The argument that supports free market as opposed to socialism is analytical and the fact that it escalates independence has made it strong.
Technical reason for agreeing
I believe in value for service. If free enterprises will ensure that people enjoy value for their toil and hard work, then I will go for that. Socialist may appear to be good in the sense that there are lesser hustles and struggles. But this will make a nation stagnate and will not allow it to make a single development especially in this era of technological advancements which are so dynamic and keep on changing day and night. Let governments regulate operations by giving market that chance to influence all the factors in the market.
Support of belief
I would advise governments to believe with me that free markets can be the genesis of new innovations and ideas in the market which can as well be new sources of revenue collection which the government can then use to develop their nations. Ideally, free markets are superior to socialist systems when they produce is compared in the long-run.

Work cited
FIRST WRITING ASSIGNMENT MATERIAL / Pgs. 55-56 of the Critical Thinking Text 7th Edition (pg. 74 of the 6th Edition)