Climate Change: Controversial Ideas




Climate Change


Institution Affiliation:

Climate Change


Climate change refers to a change in worldwide or provincial atmosphere designs; specifically a change obvious from the mid to late twentieth century onwards and ascribed to a great extent to the expanded levels of air carbon dioxide delivered by the utilization of fossil energizes (Seinfeld & Pandis, 2016). For a long time a number of researchers have had proposed a number of conflicting ideas about climate change.
The opposing viewpoints
Overpowering experimental agreement says human action is basically in charge of worldwide environmental change. The 2010 Anderegg study found that 97-98% of atmosphere scientists distributed most effectively in their field concur that human movement is basically in charge of worldwide environmental change. The concentrate additionally found that the aptitude of specialists unconvinced of human-created environmental change is “considerably beneath” that of analysts who concur that human action is basically in charge of environmental change (Seinfeld & Pandis, 2016). These scientists argue, the various human activities such the release of industrial waste into the water bodies disorients the chemical composition of the water leading to increased temperatures. The burning of fossil fuels which releases carbon gas and other gases into the air leading to the formation of fog have also contributed greatly to the rising world temperatures. The argument is strong on how it identifies the human activities but it fails to give a detailed explanation of how the activities cause climate change.
More than one thousand researchers differ that human movement is basically in charge of worldwide atmosphere change. A group of climatologists test people are essentially in charge of environmental change and rather trust that environmental change is brought on by an equivalent blend of people and the earth (37%), for the most part by the earth (5%) (Siegfried, 2013). The argument has identified that both human and other natural processes contribute to climate change but it fails to accept that the main proponent of climate change is the human actions on the earth surface.
Rising levels of human-delivered gasses discharged into the air causes a greenhouse effect that traps warmth and causes a worldwide temperature alteration. As daylight hits the earth, a portion of the glow is consumed by nursery gasses in the environment, for example, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (NO2) (Seinfeld & Pandis, 2016). These gasses trap warmth and cause the planet to warm through a procedure called the greenhouse effect. Since 1751 around 337 billion metric huge amounts of CO2 has been discharged into the climate from the copying of fossil powers and bond generation, expanding air CO2 from the pre-mechanical level of around 280 ppm (parts per million to a high of 400 ppm in 2013. Methane, which is expanding in the climate because of farming and fossil fuel generation, traps 84 times as much warmth as CO2 for the initial 20 years it is noticeable all around, and is in charge of around one-fifth of a worldwide temperature alteration (Bliuc, et al, 2015). The argument strongly identifies greenhouse gases but it fails to explain how these gases can be eliminated or prevented.
Earth’s atmosphere has constantly warmed and cooled, and the twentieth century ascend in worldwide temperature is inside the limits of normal temperature vacillations in the course of the last 3,000 years. A 2003 study by analysts at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics found that “numerous records uncover that the twentieth century is most likely not the hottest or an extraordinarily amazing climatic time of the most recent thousand years.” A recent report distributed in Nature found that “high temperatures – like those seen in the twentieth century before 1990 – happened around AD 1000 to 1100” in the Northern Hemisphere. The argument has clearly singled out the varying climate change but it fails to specify how hot the climate was by then to enhance easy comparison.
An Earth-wide temperature boost brought about by human-created greenhouse gasses is bringing about the Arctic ice top to soften at an expanding rate. From 1953–2006, Arctic Ocean ice declined 7.8% for every decade. As the Arctic ice spread keeps on diminishing, the measure of the sun’s warmth reflected by the ice once again into space additionally diminishes (Trenberth, 2014). This positive-criticism circle increases an Earth-wide temperature boost at a rate considerably speedier than past atmosphere models had anticipated. Some studies foresee the Arctic could turn out to be almost ice free at some point between 2020-2060. In the argument estimation on when the arctic ice top will be completely melted has been given by they fail to explain how they come into this and some of the signs of the melting arctic ice (Kahan, et al., 2012).
The rate of a worldwide temperature alteration has moderated in the course of the most recent decade despite the fact that air CO2 proceeds to increase. According to Emeritus Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute, the reason for the nonappearance of warming in the course of recent years is that the warmth is covering up in the profound sea. In any case, this is simply an affirmation that the climate models neglect to reproduce the trades of warmth between the surface layers and the more profound seas. The argument has identified the absence of warming for the last seventeen years but it has not given an explanation for the drop in the warming.
I agree that the human activities have contributed a bigger chunk to the emerging climate change; this is through the activities that lead to adding more of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere such as burning of the fossil fuels. Secondly I agree that the gases that are released by human activities into the air have resulted into greenhouse effect that causes global warming (Kosaka & Xie, 2013). Lastly I concur with the argument that the temperature rise that has been created by the presence of the greenhouse gases into the earth atmosphere has contributed greatly ……..
Seinfeld, J. H., & Pandis, S. N. (2016). Atmospheric chemistry and physics: from air pollution to climate change. John Wiley & Sons.

Did it help you?

Cite this Page

Climate Change: Controversial Ideas. (2022, Feb 01). Retrieved from

Need customer essay sample written special for your assignment?

Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

Order custom paper

Without paying upfront